Outrage Re: Activist Massachusetts Judge Chips Away at the Defense of Marriage Act (351 hits)
‘This judge’s claim that there’s no reason for marriage to be defined as ‘one man and one woman’ should go down as one of the most outrageous rulings in court history.’
In what has been called a “wild pair of rulings” designed to undermine marriage – and force the federal government to recognize same-s*x marriage – U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro of Massachusetts ruled unconstitutional a section of a 1996 law that defines marriage as between one man and one woman and prevents one state from using the Constitution’s “full faith and credit clause” from imposing same-s*x marriage on the rest of the country.
In the first case – Gill v. Office of Personnel Management – Tauro found that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violated the Due Process clause of the Fifth Amendment that requires equal protection under the law.
In the second case – Massachusetts v. Health and Human Services – he ruled that DOMA also violated the 10th Amendment, which reserves power to the states or to the people.
oh... wow... Juicy... Ive gotta plead my Fifth Amendment Right here!!! and im sending out a S.O.S. do you remember Pince's hit... Controversey.... Pop Life...???? LOL!!! This is gonna stir up a whopper................((sista I luv ya.... ))
Saturday, July 10th 2010 at 10:32PM
Cynthia Merrill Artis
I just try to post things that I find interesting. I personally think that we ought to let God judge GLBT people. I think they have been mistreated for far too long and had they been treated better we wouldn't be at this point in our history going to court deciding matters like these.
Sunday, July 11th 2010 at 1:30AM
Jen Fad
