CHILDREN BORN IN 1992 OR LATER MORE LIKELY TO DEVELOP AUTISM, STUDY FINDS (1730 hits)
CDC Autism Prevalence Findings Consistent with Vaccine Mercury Role in Autism Increase
CDC tries to explain away rise in disorder, but SafeMinds review shows the numbers are clear on epidemic
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta released new figures showing the alarming prevalence of autism in this country, with about 1 in 175 school aged children having an autism diagnosis. However, a review of the study by SafeMinds has found that the CDC’s interpretation of their own numbers is missing half the story – the half that says that the dramatic rise in autism in the 1990s is real and corresponds to the increased exposure to mercury from infant vaccines.
“The study, while valuable in showing that autism rates are high, also substantiated that the rate of autism has increased during the 1990s, and that the rate of autism among children born after 1992 are at epidemic proportions of 6.8-7.6 cases per thousand,” said SafeMinds Executive Director Sallie Bernard. The rate of autism among children in the study born 1986- 1992 were much lower, 4.1-4.6 cases per thousand, about 3/5 the rate of the children born after 1992. “The rise in autism rates for children born after1992 as compared to those born between 1986 and 1992 corresponds to increased exposures from mercury in infant vaccines. Two new mercury- containing vaccines were added to the infant schedule in 1990-1991, and it is after this time period that the rate in autism increased dramatically.”
During its press conference on the study findings, the CDC tried to explain away the increase, saying autism trends could not be derived from the study and that the higher rate of autism among children born from1992 onward could be due to broadening of diagnostic criteria or to the older children losing their autism diagnosis. These excuses are disputed by SafeMinds and other autism organizations. The differences in prevalence rates between the age groups of the study are statistically significant, meaning they are unlikely to have occurred by chance, so the study does have value in understanding autism trends. There is no evidence that changes in diagnostic criteria would have effected children born 1986-1992 less than those born after 1992. Historically, only 10%-15% of autistic children later lose their diagnosis, not enough to explain the huge differences in prevalence between older and younger age groups.
“The CDC does not want to acknowledge the increase in autism because it implicates mercury in vaccines,” explained Bernard. “The CDC is in charge of vaccine safety, so proof of harm from vaccines reflects poorly on them. Looking at the way they have spun these results, they have dropped the ball again in their handling of the autism epidemic.” __________________
