D. C. Federal District Court "STRIKES DOWN" IRS SIMPLIFIED EXCISE TAX PHONE REFUND PROCEDURE (639 hits)
HOLDING THAT, "..An IRS published 'notice' (setting out the requirements for taxpayers to claim credit for illegally levied telephone excise taxes) should have been issued through 'Administrative Procedure Act' provisions-instructions in IRS Notices 2006-50; 2007-11 have been vacated by this court. In effect, all 110 to 115 MILLION TAXPAYERS' refund of long distance federal excise tax refunds-whether credit/refunds have been returned to taxpayers by IRS, are yet to be requested as phone tax refunds by taxpayers to IRS, or as of April 5, 2012, Taxpayers have been given a period of time to "RETHINK" options taken for credit vs refund of telephone EXCISE TAXES ON ILLEGALLY COLLECTED IRS TAXES. The IRS was scathingly CHASTISED for 'COAXING, i.e., INFLUENCED on their 2006 tax year returns (filed first, January 2007) to take a simplified refund of taxes up to $60 maximum-no DOCUMENTATION) or opt TO ITEMIZE ACTUAL NONCOLLECTIBLE TAXES which could require documentation of refund amount claimed for the 41-month phone tax refund period.
See the analysis of an IRS SIX YEAR TAX REFUND CASE-LARGEST IN IRS TAX REFUND HISTORY-which also, has become one FASCINATING POST-COURT RULING TAX REFUND CASE IRS SCENARIO; one the IRS, says the court, "IRS CANNOT WALK AWAY FROM".' More on this case ruling can be found in Leland Beck's April10, 2012 analysis at www.fedregsadvisor.com/2012/04/10/irs-violated-apa-must-propose-rule-by-lelandbeck-04/10. IRS has subsequently issued GUIDEWIRE ANNOUNCEMENT 2012-16. It summarized in part, as litigation of the above issues continues, taxpayers are encouraged to file (or amend a filed return) for a Telephone Excise Tax Refund if they have not already done so. See my FB posts for the six-year background on this intriguing case my wife and I have closely followed for six years. The new phone tax refund case has a deadline of July 27, 2012, to make such request to IRS.
For the last SIX YEARS, he -Cooper nd Associates Tax Services-Twenty-First Century Solutions Company, my Wife, Renae Cooper's, IRS E-file tax preparation and advocacy companies (hablamos Espanol) have striven to show our clients, the better way, by far, was to 'itemize' those illegally levied long distance telephone excise tax charges. The opposition we have received has been stiff-almost relentless, sometimes faced from our competitors, partnering associates-harsh and severe-with threats of being jailed for 'tax procedure wrongdoings-by Law Enforcement Authorities. The IRS had not given the public its required -legally entitled-ADVANCE NOTICE PERIOD, OPPORTUNITY OUR DEMOCRACY HAS ESTABLISHED-BEGINNING IN, JULY 1776-TO HAVE CHANCE TO COMMENT RULEMAKE IN ANY DECISION, WHICH WOULD AFFECT A RIGHT TO PROPERTY. OUR MONEY IS ALSO OUR PROPERTY AND THE COURT'S RULING JUSTIFIES RENAE'S COMPANY'S APPROACH TO OBTAIN THE MAXIMUM-BY ITEMIZING-SUMS OF MONEY TAKEN-PLUS INTEREST-WHICH WAS NEVER LEGALLY ALLOWED TO BE COLLECTED IN TAXES! Which Makes HER 50,000 clients happier to have had approximately 5 MILLION DOLLARS-in 6 years-returned to them.
Sunday, May 6th 2012 at 2:54PM
Bill Cooper
Did you know that they took this ruling off the website Brother? In other words, it said it can not be found! This is some information that they don't want us to find.
Most of us don't know these things and that's why we have a Brother such as yourself to enlighten us. Thanks for being you, Brother!
Sunday, May 6th 2012 at 5:08PM
Min.Dr.LaDonna Blaylock D.D.
