WHILE WACTHING THE COLBERT REPORT TONIGHT, IT HIT ME LIKE A TON OF BRICKS WHY SOME CAN NOT UNDERSTAAND WHAT I (3142 hits)
SAY...COLBERT MADE MORE SENSE AND SPOKE MORE TRUTH THAN ANY ONE RUNNING AGAINST B.H.O IN 2012 THEREFORE THE CONTENTS OF HIS PROGRAM TONIGHT WOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED INTO A CAMPAIGN SPEECH OR INTO A DEBATE. OH WELL, WHAT NEXT...TAKING AWAY RIGHTS TO VOTE IN 2012?!? (NUP)
example, If the courts say it is illegal to charge a person with a crime before it is committed, then a law on Anchor as definde will never stand up in a court of law.... If marriage between a man and a woman stands as defined then insest will never stand up in court....men geting married when one is in female dress and pass as a female and the law against search and sesure in illegal with out a search then they can get married.(actually here I think of Newt and if he has ever married NOT under his legal name...
some members in my family still believe my actual name is LUNKY, because this is what my family call me.
it is things like this that earns lawyers those mega-bucks...the laws can not be changes at will as some think.
NOw back to colbert's program...the only thing I disagreed with is him being not able to see why a Black person would refuse the not seeing skin color bit...
@S.C. "I" will not allow anyone to redefine me...I chose to be identified as Irma, Lunky, Black, African-American...hell you can call me ***** if you use the right tone. "I" would allow Ron Paul to call me a ***** but for Newt / Bill, Hillary Clinton, Jesse Jackson, ect. it would be the last action of superiorty .And, no that is not a threat...lol (smile)
