The New Yorker Was Right!
Well, I'll say it...the New Yorker was Right!
I don't like it, but it does bring things out in the open. If you listen to talk radio, people actually believe this! I LOVE talk radio because you can't see faces, so people are anonymous. Anonymity brings true feelings. There are a whole lot of people that think this way too. Kinda makes them look pretty stupid to just latch on to every stereotype they hear.
The reality is they are just insecure themselves. Many insecurity issues stem from a lack of esteem in one's own accomplishments, relationships, sense of personal power to better their own lives, families, etc. People like that respond primarily to their current emotional state. Let’s not do the same. We are a thinking people seeking to understand “Why?” Maybe the New Yorker just wanted to sabotage the campaign. Maybe the New Yorker wants to keep the status quo. Maybe the New Yorker even wanted to earn a buck. More likely the New Yorker, a LIBERAL publication whose primary role is to satirize, not glamorize polarizing events, sought to expose it’s readers to the stereotypes. "Let’s talk about it," is their defense. Even CNN stated that most people's biggest problem wasn't Michelle’s "Gun-toting Angela Davis" depiction, nor the "terrorist fist bump" the militants (lol) used, not even the "Osama Bin Laden" portrait in the oval office...it was the burning of the American Flag!
This is exactly what we supporters for change want, people to openly argue how ridiculous these stereotypes are. Mind you, nobody has the gumption to argue FOR the merits of the cover. If they do, I hope they try it with me. We're just lucky they've never seen Obama's eastern looking, turban wearing barber (lol).
Yeah, the New Yorker got it right.
Rob Wimberly
Chairperson
Broncos4Barack
I don't like it, but it does bring things out in the open. If you listen to talk radio, people actually believe this! I LOVE talk radio because you can't see faces, so people are anonymous. Anonymity brings true feelings. There are a whole lot of people that think this way too. Kinda makes them look pretty stupid to just latch on to every stereotype they hear.
The reality is they are just insecure themselves. Many insecurity issues stem from a lack of esteem in one's own accomplishments, relationships, sense of personal power to better their own lives, families, etc. People like that respond primarily to their current emotional state. Let’s not do the same. We are a thinking people seeking to understand “Why?” Maybe the New Yorker just wanted to sabotage the campaign. Maybe the New Yorker wants to keep the status quo. Maybe the New Yorker even wanted to earn a buck. More likely the New Yorker, a LIBERAL publication whose primary role is to satirize, not glamorize polarizing events, sought to expose it’s readers to the stereotypes. "Let’s talk about it," is their defense. Even CNN stated that most people's biggest problem wasn't Michelle’s "Gun-toting Angela Davis" depiction, nor the "terrorist fist bump" the militants (lol) used, not even the "Osama Bin Laden" portrait in the oval office...it was the burning of the American Flag!
This is exactly what we supporters for change want, people to openly argue how ridiculous these stereotypes are. Mind you, nobody has the gumption to argue FOR the merits of the cover. If they do, I hope they try it with me. We're just lucky they've never seen Obama's eastern looking, turban wearing barber (lol).
Yeah, the New Yorker got it right.
Rob Wimberly
Chairperson
Broncos4Barack
I feel that people maxmize on having the lime light this was not neccessary but now they are all over the place how much do they value money
that is what this looks like