YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME...THE DEFENSE JUST SAID THE DR. CAN NOT MEANTION THE DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS IN TW
O DIFFERENT DICTIONAARYS BECAUSE...GET THIS, IT WILL BE HEAR SAY...THIS IS AFTER SHE SAID SCIENTIFICALLY GZ IF HEAD "SLAMED" ON CONCRETE IT WAS ONLY O-N-E TIME AND OT IFE THREATING BECAUSE HE SHOWED NO SIGNS OF CONCUSSION NOR DID HE NEED STICHES...AND HER MEDICAL TESTMONY CONTINUES...JUST HAD TO TELL YOU ABOUT HOW HE DERENSE IS BASED ON TM'S "SLAMING GZ'S HEAD AND TO DEFINE SLAM IS HEAR SAY...
YOU TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT AS "I" REFUSE TO GO ON PLANET STUDK ON STUPID RIGH T NOW.LOL!!!(SMILE)
YOU TRY TO FIGURE IT OUT AS "I" REFUSE TO GO ON PLANET STUDK ON STUPID RIGH T NOW.LOL!!!(SMILE)
I GUESS IT IS TOO BAD THE DEFENSE CAN'T ALLOW DNA IN BECAUSE THE DR. CAN ONLY SAY GZ WAS STRUCK ON HE HEAD ONCE BY AN OBJECT THAT HAD A SERFACE LIKE CEMENT...DID'T GZ AY HE BELIEVE TM WAS HITING HIM WITH AND OBJECT?!?...STRAIGHT OUT OF IS MOUTH TO THE COURT'S EARS AND TRANSCRIPTS.LOL!!!
BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU SAY BECAUSE IT CAN AND WILL BE USED AGAINST YOU IN A COURT OF LAW EVEN IN A COURT IN FL. THAT IS IF THEY DON'T GET RID OF IT BEFORE THE TRAIL IS OVER AND MAKE IT RETROACTIVE.LOL!!!(SMILE)