WELL TOMORROW ANOTHER CASE THAT HAS USED THE BIBLE TO PREVENT PEACE ON EARTH, GOOD WILL TOWARDS MANKIND WILL

"I" CHANT (PRAY) THAT ONEDAY WE CAN TRY TO NOT USE RELIGION AS A WEAPON TO CAUSE SUCH MANKIND'S INHUMANITY TO MANKIND...

LOV YA A-L-L (S-M-I-L-E)

AS FOR ME, "I" HAVE BEEN SMILING ALL DAY, BECAUSE ALL DAY AS I HAVE BEEN HEARING ABOUT PROP 8 GOING BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT...

IHAVE BEEN HEARING HOW IT IS GOING TO BE COMING FACE TO FACE WITH BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION.(SMILE)

JIM CROW AKA...

MAY 18, 1896 : U.S. SUPREME COURT DECIDES PLESSY VS. FERGUSON, UPHOLDING "SEPARATE BUT EQUAL" PRINCIPLE AND THUS ALLOWING STATE LAW REQUIRING SEGREGATION OF THE RACES.


PLESSY BROUGHT A TRAIN TICKET SEAT...WHEN HE WAS SOLD THE TICKET IT MOST LIKELY WAS TIOUGHT HE WAS BUYING IT FOR HIS WHITE BOSS (HE WAS VER LIGHT SKINED) BUT, AS HE WAS NOT DEEMED WHITE HE WAS TO RIDE WITH THE LUGGAGE AND HE RERUSED TO DO SO (SMILE)

NOW THE 14TH AMENDMENT IS TAUGHT IN BLACK HISTORY STUDY CLASS A LITTLE DIFFERENT AS WE WERE TAUGHT THE ..."DUE PROCESS"...IS WE WERE STILL TECHNICALLY CONSIDERED 'PROPERTY' AND OUR MASTER/ BOSS IF HE COULDN'T PAY A DEBT, WE COULD BE COLLECTED FOR THE DEBT AND HERE IS WHERE THE 'DUE PROCESS' CAN TO BEING...WE COULD GO TO COURT...AFTER IT WAS RATIFIED...

SECTION 1. ALL PERSONS BORN OR NATURALIZED IN THE UNITED STATES AND SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF, ARE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES AND OF THE STATE OF THE STATE WHEREIN THEY RESIDE. NOSTATE SHALL MAKE OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES; NOR SHALL ANY STATE DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE, LIBRTY, OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; NOR DANY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF TH ELAW.(SMILE)

THE 14TH AMENDMENT RADIIED JULY 9, 1868

@THE SUPREME COURT...THANKS FOR BRINGING UP IN YOUR ARGUMENTS TODAY ABOUT MAYBE THE CUT OFF DATE FOR ALLOWING MARRIAGE SHOULD BE AGE 50 WHICH LEADS RIGHT INTO ANOTHER VIOLATION OF BVBOE SINCE MEN CANSTILL PRODUCE LONG AFTER TEH FEMALE CAN'T.LOL!!! (S-M-I-L-E)

FROM THE WAY THE ORAL ARGUMENTS IS HAVING THE CONSERVATIVES TRYING IN VAIN TO GET THEIER FOOT OUT OF THEIR OWN MOUTHS...I AM SURE THE CONSERVATIVES AS A WHOLE WISH THE SUPREME COURT WOULD HAVE NOT TAKEN THIS CASE...

OOPS, OBAMA STILLHAS AT LEASE ONE MOE SUPREME COURT PICK AND MAYBE TWO THAT IS GOING TO MAKE SURE OUR SUPREME COURT REMAINS FOCUSED ON THE LAW AND NOT ON TRYING TO HAVE JIM CROW RISE AGAIN IN AMERICA. LOL!!! (SMILE)...

AND, THE WAY OUR COURTS ARE NOW GOING AGAINST EVEN MAKING ONE EFFORT TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN, I LOVE THIS IDEA GOING AROUND TO DO LIKE THEY DID THE OFFICE OF PRESIDENT AND OTHER POLITICIANS...

PUT A CAP ON HOW LONG ONE CAN SERVE IN THIS POSITION OF SUPREME COURT JUDGE...BECAUSE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IS AT RISK...AND, A NEW MAJORITY RACE COULD MEAN 'PAY BACK TIME' NOT GOOD EITHER BECAUSE THE LGBT ORGINAZATION IS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL GOING RIGHT NOW IN AMERICA. (NUP/ SMILE)