DO YOU KNOW WHAT A 'LOGICAL ARGUMENT" IS"..."I"ASK BECAUSE OF OUR PRESIDENT'S SAYING WHAT HE SAID ABOUT HE WOU
LD NOT BE GOING THROUGH THE DEBT CEILING AGAIN WITH THE RIGHT-WINGERS...HAVE YOU NOTICED...THE PRESIDENT IS TALKING ABOUT PAYING DEBTS ALL READY OCCURED (BY BUSH'S WARS)...THE RIGHT ARE TALKING ABOUT 'FUTURE DEBTS',GET IT YET?!? LOL(SMILE)...THIS IS NOT ONLY NOT AN ARGUMENT AT ALL SINCE THEY ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT THE SAME THINGS AND BOTH ARE TELLING THE TRUTH...JUST TAKING FULL ADVANTAGE OF WHAT...OUR BEING BRAIN WASHED TO JUST TAKE SIDES AND NOT EVEN KNOW WHY SINCE WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON ANY WAY???(NUP/ SMILE)
A LOGICAL ARGUMENT CAN NOT BE HELD IF BOTH SIDES HAVE ALREADY MADE UPTHEIR MINDS THE OTHER SIDE IS WRONG (AND WHY YOU CAN'THAVE DIALOGUE AND WAR AT THE SAME TIME) AND THEY WILL NOT ALLOW ANY THING THEY SAY INTO THE ARGUMENT...
LOGIC SAYS WHEN THIS AGREEMENT HAS BEEN MET SO TALK ABOUT ANY THING BUT THAT SUBJECT...
THERE IS NO WAY WHAT THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS DID THELAST TIME CAN EVER HAPPEN IN 2012...BECAUSE LAST YEAR THEY WERE TALKIING ABOUT SPENDING CUTS ONFUTURE DEBTS AND ABOUT ALREADY ACCUMILATED DEBTS FROM THE PAST, AS PARTS OF THE 2012 DEBT CEILINGS...
NOW THEY BOTH SAY THIS IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN SINCE THE CONGRESS SAYS ONLY ABOUT FUTURE SPENDINGS BECAUSE BUSH HAS NO DEBTS SINCE THEY NOW ARE A-L-L YOURS MR. PRESIDENT...
STILL DON;T GET IT...I ASSURE THE LOBBY ARE TICKLED PINK YOU DONT GET IT AS YOU MAY VOTE THE NEXT TIME ON THIS MATTER. (SMILE)