Siebra Muhammed posted a blog entitled, "Minister Farrakhan speaks on Black people in the Bible". (519 hits)
I saw and attentively listened to the video. However, know where in his preaching did Mr. Farrakhan pointed out just where Black Americans are written about in the Bible.
This ignorant man, Mr. Farrakhan has a wrong perspective about the Bible. The Bible is the testimony of the Jewish and European gentiles of how God help them in their times of trouble as well as personally help them. For instance, it is the testimony of the Jewish people how God delivered them out of bondage and slavery in Egypt.
The prophets in the Bible are Jewish prophets and the principal people are Jewish people all other people are incidental to the Jewish people.
Black Americans has to write our own testimony concerning how God delivered us out of subjugation in White America and into sovereignty on a fertile and reasonable portion of this continent that we could call our very own country with borders to worship God, pursue life, liberty, happiness and prosperity in our own way.
Therefore, the first step we must take is to get out of the Bible and the Quran. These books are not the religious books and guide for Black Americans. No prophets in the Bible that God rose up were out of the midst of Black Americans. Prophet Mohammed was not risen up out of the midst of Black Americans either. Since prophets are racially different our prophet must be a Black American risen up out of the midst of Black Americans. Am I making any sense?
But anyway, don't be misled! Mr. Farrakhan in his preaching did not point out where Black Americans are written about in the Bible as he went ahead bashing the Christian preachers magnifying their ignorance. But, Mr. Farrakhan is as ignorant as the Christian preachers are as well.
When God comes to a people to help them the first thing that God does is to anoint a prophet for the people and Mr. Farrakhan is not Black America's prophet. Am I saying anything that is incorrect?
First, farakhanMadoof is a selfRecorded murder suspect and a cook county recorded thief.
Second, anything he MIGHT comment about the bibleEuropa is based on His love and experience as a subject and innitiator of paganChristianity; AND no christianAmerica or European agrees with him................
THIRD, NONE of the 2 Billion Believers of AlQur'aan and the Sunnah of Mohamed(as) would listen to his paganChristian rhetoric.
FOURTH, to entitle a subject 'black' people in the bibleEuropa is an INSULT to Science, Biology and the nonEuropean world............
and Harry, 2,3, and 4 describe YOU, with your selfProfessed 68 IQ retardation.
harryWrites, "Yet, you and Mr. Farrakhan are not Arabian people, but claim the religion of Prophet Mohammed. And, I am the one that has pointed this out."
harry, you are my 68 IQ retarded wwweb correspondent, whom I am trying to make go over the top and get medical attention for your severe mental retardation and dilusion...............
and ------ the following 7 paragraphs highlite Scientific research.
The dominant view among scientists concerning the origin of anatomically modern humans is the "Out of Africa" or recent African origin hypothesis, which argues that Homo sapiens arose in Africa and migrated out of the continent around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago
Nucleotide diversity is based on single mutations called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The nucleotide diversity between humans is about 0.1%, which is 1 difference per 1,000 nucleotides between two humans chosen at random. This amounts to approximately 3 million SNPs since the human genome has about 3 billion nucleotides. It is estimated that a total of 10 million SNPs exist in the human population.
Recent analysis has shown that non-SNP variation accounts for much more human genetic variation than single nucleotide diversity. It is estimated that approximately 0.4% of the genomes of unrelated people typically differ with respect to copy number. When copy number variation is included, human to human genetic variation is estimated to be at least 0.5%.
Since the 1960's a majority of Scientists have come to understand the concept of race as a social construct mapped on to phenotypes in different culturally determined ways, and not as a biological concept. A 2000 study by Celera Genomics found that human beings largely have similar genetic input, and that citizens of any given village in the world, whether in Scotland or Tanzania, hold 90 percent of the genetic variability that humanity has to offer. The study found only .01% of genes account for a person's external appearance. Biological adaptation also plays a role in phenotype of bodily features and skin type. According to Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, "Skin color and body size are less subject to genetic influence since they are also affected by exposure to the sun and diet, but there is always a hereditary component that can be quite important." Jorde and Wooding (2004) wrote that some studies have argued that clusters from genetic markers did not correspond well to the subjects' self-identified race/ethnic group. These studies, however, were based on only several dozen or fewer genetic markers, and such a number, unless carefully selected, are argued to not be sufficient. In contrast, studies based on more genetic markers have found high agreements.
A study by Tang et al. in 2005 used 326 genetic markers in order to determine genetic clusters. The 3,636 subjects involved in the study, from the United States and Taiwan, self-identified as belonging to white, African American, East Asian, or Hispanic (=self-identified race/ethnic group (SIRE)). The study found "nearly perfect correspondence between genetic cluster and SIRE for major ethnic groups living in the United States, with a discrepancy rate of only 0.14%."
The most widely used human racial categories are based on various combinations of visible traits such as skin color, eye shape and hair texture. However, some Scientists, argue that many of these traits are non-concordant in that they are not necessarily expressed together. For example, skin color and hair texture vary independently.
Bottom line, harry -----siebra and farakhanMadoof
I know that Science and Biology are HARD subjects to understand, but the above means that you and I could be closer physically, than you and your relatives........
The differences that YOU and I have though are ENORMOUS, when we talk about Intelligence and Monotheistic Thought----Our Understanding of the Creator of Adaam(as), AND the physical, mental and metaphyscial Evolution of The Family of Adaam(as)
I do not share the gene of slaverAmericana paganChristianity, with you, because my reference in mental and metaphysical Thought is based on afroCentric History and Scholarship and I DO NOT SHARE YOUR racialisticRacist division of Nucleotides.
your comments, in my opinion, are NEVER correct and originate in yourMind only, NOT, intelligence, History or Scholarship.
